Is the Structure of L.A. County a Quasi-Dictatorial One?
Introduction
A  little less than a year ago, a friend of mine who holds a seat on his  neighborhood town council, began sharing with me some very serious  on-going problems bubbling in his community.  At first, I listened with  half an ear but over time I started to wonder what the heck is going on  out there?  Random complaints about any system is bound to happen but  when the stories accrue and the numbers of afflicted individuals grow  then it may be time to see if there is a flaw in the system?  
As I began putting together information  about the board of supervisors, I decided to do a simple Google search  on the subject.  To my dismay and frustration, I have found very little  definitional material.  My keywords were: role of the board of supervisors.   Apparently, each county has its own set of rules.  From state to state,  the title and obligations can mean many different things.
After scouring the internet, I feel just as  clueless now as I did before I started.  After giving up, I decided to  phone Sachi Hamai, the Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors’  office.  Perhaps they could direct me to some relevant materials instead  of me wasting a lot of time on this mystery hunt.  
The following phone call caused me to speak  with four different staff members because I apparently threw them a  curveball in my question.  
1)      I  spoke with Celine, a secretary in Ms. Hamai’s office.  I asked for  information online telling me the role of the board of supervisors.  She  asked to put me on hold.  
2)      She  transferred me to Maria, a representative of their Public Affairs  department.  Maria directed me to a page on their website that offered  general links but no specific information.  Maria put me on hold and  came back saying that David Summers, acting Public Information Officer  suggested I go directly to my supervisor’s website for better  information.  Then, Maria offered to transfer me.
3)      Georgia,  a secretary answered and was very cool on the phone.  She gave up too  and then transferred me to my fourth and final phone conversation.
4)      David,  an administrative assistant offered to give me a verbal overview of the  role of the supervisor but I told him I want to be directed to official  information on their website.  He suggested I look under Supervisor  Yaroslavsky’s “Our Mission” page and that will answer my question but  actually it didn’t.  It is a nice introduction with a nice photo of the  supervisor but no clear definition of his role.
Since he had nowhere to  direct me online, David suggested I look up the answer on Wikipedia.  I  told him I thought it was funny that I would have to go to an  independent source to get that information where it should be easily  accessible on their own site.  The analogy I used was, “If someone is  applying for the position of teacher then it only makes sense that a  brief description of the role is attached to the ad.”  David explained,  “The role of supervisor is more complicated than the role of a  teacher.”  Ultimately, David gave up on me too and put me on hold.  He  came back on the line to inform me that his Press Deputy would call me  back.
After this hot potato game of talking to  multiple people, I felt exhausted.  Was I asking too much in this  request?  When I started, it seemed simple enough.  Nevertheless, while I  waited for the Press Deputy to call me, I decided to take David’s  suggestion to check out Wikipedia’s answer about what the role of  supervisor is.  It confirmed that the Board oversees all three branches  of Government, including: legislative, executive and quasi-judicial  roles.  So, by definition, does this mean we are being led by a  “quasi-dictatorial” system?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_supervisors
Then the phone rang.  David was nice enough  to call back with a link directing me to the hidden treasure.  I  finally found what I was looking for.  He made me feel good by saying  that my suggestion will be passed along to his website staff to provide  the below information in a more easily accessible location.  That would  be nice. Please read the below quote from the County's own website:
It  has the largest population (10,441,080 as of January 2010) of any  county in the nation, and is exceeded by only eight states.  Approximately 27 percent of California’s residents live in Los Angeles  County. The Board of Supervisors, created by the state Legislature in  1852, is the governing body. Five supervisors are elected to four-year  terms by voters within their respective districts. The Board has  executive, legislative and quasi-judicial roles. It appoints all  department heads other than the assessor, district attorney and sheriff,  which are elective positions. The Board has delegated its role in  selecting all but a few of the department heads to the chief executive  officer, but still must approve appointments. As a subdivision of the  state, the County is charged with providing numerous services that  affect the lives of all residents. Traditional mandatory services  include law enforcement, property assessment, tax collection, public  health protection, public social services and relief to indigents. Among  the specialized services are flood control, water conservation, parks  and recreation, and many diversified cultural activities.
If you are ambitious, you can see the actual link by going here: http://lacounty.info/wps/portal/lac.  Then, you have to go to the bottom right side and click on the tab County Overview.  
Designed in a small list, the supervisor’s roles of “mandatory services” are as follows:
- law enforcement
 - property assessment
 - tax collection
 - public health protection
 - public social services
 - relief to indigents
 
Being that the Supervisor oversees all of the  above activities, if an aggrieved party has a problem with any of the  assigned agencies, who is he/she supposed to complaint to?  Can we  assume there may be a conflict of interest here?  
When I did a keyword search on finding  information about the role of president, well, that was a snap.  Many  educational links provided a general list of duties that seem rather  clear cut:  
The  President has a vice president and 15 cabinet level department which  oversees areas such as: State, Defense, Interior, Transportation and  Education, Federal Government, Homeland Security and political and  economic interests around the world.  
And,  most importantly, the President operates under a three branch  Government structure working shoulder to shoulder with the senate and  congress.  Why is it set up this way?  Naturally, to ensure checks and  balances so our constitutional rights are upheld.  
Contrastly,  the Board of Supervisors needs no approval from outside bodies to apply  their own rules, regulations and amendments.  
As  I continue to hear painful stories of aggrieved individuals who talk  about their encounters with the Sheriff’s department, Regional Planning  Code Enforcement, Nuisance Abatement Team, Child Protective Services,  and others, it really makes you wonder how it is possible that this long  standing county structure has not truly been challenged.  I think it’s  time.
References:
“County Overview”, lacounty.gov, http://lacounty.info/wps/portal/lac (4-21-11)
“Seven Roles for One President”, 2011-1996, scholastic.com, http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4683 (4-21-11)
“County Overview”, lacounty.gov, http://lacounty.info/wps/portal/lac (4-21-11)
“Seven Roles for One President”, 2011-1996, scholastic.com, http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=4683 (4-21-11)
Trethan, Phaedra, The Branches of Government, About.com, http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/usconstitution/a/branches.htm (4-21-11)
AND A SIDE NOTE FROM ZUMA DOGG: I don't care how many times he kissed your group's ass at some event...DO NOT EVER VOTE FOR ZEV YAROLOSLOBSKY FOR MAYOR OF L.A. (or janitor of Mayberry). Forget that he's shady...he's just a plain inept fool. The only thing he knows is a quicksand pit of bureaucracy. He spent $200,000 to set up his social media platforms. (Didn't you and I do it ourselves, for free? So maybe he had to pay someone to do it. $200,000???? DOH!)
AND A SIDE NOTE FROM ZUMA DOGG: I don't care how many times he kissed your group's ass at some event...DO NOT EVER VOTE FOR ZEV YAROLOSLOBSKY FOR MAYOR OF L.A. (or janitor of Mayberry). Forget that he's shady...he's just a plain inept fool. The only thing he knows is a quicksand pit of bureaucracy. He spent $200,000 to set up his social media platforms. (Didn't you and I do it ourselves, for free? So maybe he had to pay someone to do it. $200,000???? DOH!)