Showing posts with label dumb growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dumb growth. Show all posts

Monday, March 31, 2008

Los Angeles' (Dumb) Smart Growth Density Plan: Even England Is Skeptical of Villaraigosa's Plan


Oh this is hilarious. It's like a Zuma Dogg "Dumb Growth" article but from the U.K.

Hey Villaraiahole and Garshady...looks like you shady clowns aren't fooling anyone in the world. They're even laughing at you in England, y'all. (YOU BIG DUMMIES! YOU'RE DESTROYING THE DNA OF THE CITY...AND THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS IT. YOU ARE GONNA BURN AT THE KARMA STAKE ON JUDGMENT DAY FOR YOUR ACTIONS!)

From The Economist

United States
Redesigning cities
Tackling the hydra

Mar 27th 2008 | LOS ANGELES

Its politicians are determined to turn Los Angeles into a normal city

Excerpts:

Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles' mayor, turned up to declare it a model for future development. The event made the evening news. There can be few cities the size of Los Angeles where the prospect of a nine-storey office complex would cause such a fuss.

Los Angeles has long epitomised car-oriented sprawl. As early as 1946 the historian Carey McWilliams judged it “a collection of suburbs in search of a city”.

Last summer the city council changed zoning rules to allow tiny apartments to be built in and around downtown Los Angeles. On March 19th it rejected a plan to put 5,600 homes on the city's northern frontier, signalling that the metropolis must now grow up, not out. From next month developers will be allowed to build blocks of flats up to 35% bigger than previously, so long as they include some cheap housing.

Not without a fight

Six miles (10km) west of North Hollywood, a four-storey building is rising next to a car-wash on Ventura Boulevard. When finished, it will contain about 130 apartments and an underground car park. To an outsider it seems innocuous. To local residents, schooled by almost a century of strict zoning to believe that bedrooms must be separated from shops, it is anathema. Gerald Silver, a local homeowner, predicts epic traffic jams from this and similar developments nearby. He complains that, without consultation, the neighbourhood is being turned into a version of Manhattan. He is not alone.

“You're beginning to see a neighbourhood revolution,” says Zev Yaroslavsky, one of Los Angeles' shrewdest and most powerful politicians. He gives warning that outraged citizens may add an initiative to the ballot next year that would block dense housing projects, “smart” or not.

At present few use Los Angeles' skeletal rail system—259,000 journeys are made each day, compared with 1.2m bus journeys—and the network is growing painfully slowly.

Near the office construction site a 14-storey block of flats (it seems enormous in the San Fernando Valley) has already appeared, and others will follow. The hope is that residents will both live and work there, or walk a few hundred yards to the local subway stop. But Cary Adams, a local resident, notes the developers are hedging their bets: two giant car parks are also scheduled for construction. This is, indeed, the genetic flaw in Los Angeles' new DNA.

The politicians and planners are gambling that, by arranging Angelenos in a more conventional pattern, they can change their behaviour. Perhaps it will work. But if they are wrong, an already crowded city will simply gum up.

Click here for full article

ZumaTimes.com
In case you are a reader from England,
Zuma Times is better than New York Times or L.A. Times

Thursday, February 28, 2008

LA Weekly SEVEN PAGE Website Post on Density Problems

From LAWeekly.com

Soon after taking the job of director of the Los Angeles Department of City Planning in 2006, Gail Goldberg made a declaration that let slip how City Hall is allowing developers to pursue a building frenzy straight out of the storied tale Chinatown.
Said Goldberg, newly arrived here from a similar post in San Diego:

"In every city in this country, the zone on the land establishes the value of the land. In Los Angeles, that's not true.

"The value of the land is not based on what the zone says ... It's based on what [the] developer believes he can change the zone to.

"This is disastrous for the city.

"Disastrous.

"Zoning has to mean something in this city."

Goldberg probably wishes she hadn't said that, not necessarily because she got reprimanded by L.A.'s famously vindictive Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, but because Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavksy has repeated her words in public, over and over. Yaroslavsky, who represented the city's affluent Westside District 5 as a councilman until 1994, has been staging a one-man campaign to slow City Hall's feverish promotion of density — a quiet war on the large swaths of suburbia and few hunks of countryside remaining inside the city limits.

ZUMA DOGG ON LA CITY'S "DUMB" GROWTH (Yes, I coined the phrase!)

(notice: turn volume way down.)


Full article


More on Dumb Growth/Density


Zuma Dogg's Eminent Domain Alert


zumadogg@gmail.com