Showing posts with label DWP. villaraigosa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DWP. villaraigosa. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

The LOW DOWN on Villaraigosa's Budget Proposal: E.A.A. Will Just Say "No" and the rest won't be enough. CITY HALL SCRAMBLING FOR SOLUTIONS!!!

First of all, I heard Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraiogsa's proposed (fake) budget has been exposed for what it was, a big fraud, and has slided off the table. What this means, no one knows, except, no offense, like I said, they are going to have to go back and start over.

The obvious thought, is that Villaragiosa wants to look good by firing people and reducing waste if he wants to run for governor. So my take is, he put this fake, unrealistic budget out there; unions are going to give enough of it "thumbs down" -- then the mayor will say, "Gee, it's not my fault, I gave them a realistic budget."

Except it is TOTALLY unrealistic. Stuff like $80 million in parking revenue that they PLAN on HOPEFULLY selling off, and there is NO WAY they are going to get that much.

And the whole thing is one big speculative, padded, pie-in-the-sky, hail mary pass from the 99 yard line in the Santa Ana winds. AND NOW, it looks like the rain is about to pour.

E.A.A (Engineers and Architects) voted yesterday and the ballots are being counted and I think the result will be announced tomorrow (Wed.). Look for ONE, BIG, GIGANTIC, ACROSS THE BOARD, "HELL NO" from them on EVERYTHING. Why? Unlike the smaller unions like SEIU, the E.A.A. is not required to renegotiate with the mayor, because they do not have those, "GIVE BACK" clauses Zuma Dogg was warning union members about when some public comment speakers were getting all excited about their raises. I TOLD THEM, BEWARE THE GIVE BACK CLAUSE WHICH SAYS IF THE CITY'S REVENUE FALLS ONE PERCENT (1%) BELOW "PROJECTED REVENUE" -- YOU GOTTA SIT DOWN AND GIVE BACK, Y'ALL!!!

And in these economic times, you bet your ASS it is more than 1% below "fake" projections. So this is what I was trying to warn Miriam and Donna about, when they got so mad at me for saying that they were going to have to give them back, when I said it last year.

E.A.A., (who, to clarify, WILL NOT BE GIVING ANYTHING BACK, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO) have about 7,800 members. AND THEY ALSO CANNOT BE CUT!!!

So cuts will come from the other 20,000 unions that made a deal with the devil (Mayor Antonio) and now they either give, back, or face the threat of cuts.

AND YES, Zuma Dogg is calling it the "threat" of a cut, casue I'm starting to think the whole, "give back or else" is just a bluff, to have them give back.

Cause NO ONE HAS MENTIONED that there is supposed to be this $7 BILLION in Obamarama FEDERAL STIMULATION money, that is not even mentioned in the budget!!!

$7 Billion is the size of the entire city budget (or bigger), anyway? So could Magic Obama (Earvin ain't using it anymore) come to the rescue with this money to "KEEP L.A. WORKING!!!???"

We'll have to wait and see. But some smart people ZD knows, AIN'T BUYING THE WHOLE THING!

AND FINALLY, the votes are being counted in the SEIU/other unions who voted yesterday and look for them to give back the Cost Of Live Allowance (COLA); and give back one hour a week, which is like a 2.5% cut (reduction) in pay. Didn't hear anything about the biggie, which is paying more into the pension fund, which is now needed since Villaragiosa's pension commissioners blew $7 billion in shady Wall Street investments, and now is on the hook for this amount. This will send the city into bankruptcy by 2013, but this could come down this year.

IT'S OVER FOR LOS ANGELES. IT'S WORSE THAN YOU THINK! MUERELO MADDUX (DOWNTOWN REAL ESTATE MOGUL) WENT BANKRUPT!!! WAIT UNTIL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CAVES IN, STORES CLOSE, JOBS AND BUSINESS LOST.

THE CITY WILL BE TAKING IN MUCH LESS REVENUE THAN EVEN THEIR FAKE PROJECTIONS!!!

[Sidebar: CRA will be swooping in to buy up as much foreclosed M. Maddux property as possible, according to a CRA/LA executive I spoke with, recently.]


And for the record, the problem with 10% across the board in all departments, as it was explained to me is this: 10% cut across the board in all departments is not a well thought out, or a prudent decision. SOME OF THESE DEPARTMENTS ARE BIG MONEY MAKING REVENUE GENERATORS FOR THE CITY THAT ARE OUTPERFORMING THE CITY!! WHY RUIN THEIR DEPARTMENT???

Cut the REAL waste where it exists, but across the board cuts is just a lazy, move from someone who hasn't really thought this out, has not plan, is stalling/buying time with this "fake" budget that is ALREADY OFF THE TABLE, and now they got Jack Squatness in their hands.

11 VIDEOS: VILLARAGIOSA'S TOWN HAL BUDGET MEETING IN TARZANA, CA:

Saturday, August 9, 2008

The Problem(s) With Villaraigosa's New "Affordable Housing" November Ballot Proposition (Part 2 in a continuing series)

The City of Los Angeles argues that because "working families cannot afford to live near their jobs" laws must be changed to allow for mulit-family housing. Sounds good, right? But part of this proposition says "the housing does not have to be built"; AND wants Federal "impediments" removed to allow for "unrestricted permission for unfettered construction."

First of all, obviously this would allow for a huge density problem to occur at a time when the City is already suffering from traffic gridlock on the freeways and side streets; not enough mass transit; plus all the other infrastructure strains that "unrestricted and unfettered" would only compound.

Secondly, the city has just added a "density bonus" for developers that allows them to expand their projects when they include this type of affordable housing. And, the city requires most commercial housing projects to include 20%-30% affordable housing of this type.

And although it sounds good to provide "affordable housing for working families" the housing covered under this voter approved article is supposed to be for the elderly. That is why the City is restricted to two-story buildings with no more than 30 units. (It's not supposed to be for big families. Other programs handle that.) This was created for the elderly who had no where else to go. And this demand will be increasing as baby-boomers move into this age group.

AND REMEMBER...EVEN IF YOU FAVOR THIS HOUSING TO GO TO FAMILIES INSTEAD OF ELDERLY...WE HAVE LEARNED THE BIG REASON THIS IS ON THE BALLOT IS SO THAT RELATED COS & DUBAI ROYAL FAMILY (ARAB EMIRATES) DO NOT MISS OUT ON THEIR SHARE OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF THIS MONEY FOR THEIR LUXURY, UPSCALE, CEMENT COMMERCIAL PARK AT GRAND AVENUE PROJECT.

CLICK HERE FOR Part 1!

More to Come...

ZumaTimes.com
ZumaDogg@Mayor09.com

Sunday, June 29, 2008

New Daily News Editor Carolina Garcia No Fan of L.A. Mayor Antonio Villariagosa (Based on Today's Review of His One Term)

(Pictured: Zuma Dogg proves that the mayor HAS been inside City Hall this past year despite rumors to the contrary.)

I'm not sure why the Daily News categorizes this as "Breaking News" (LOL!).

What I find most interesting is that the new DN editor, Carolina Garcia doesn't appear to be a blind supporter of Villaraigosa, luckily, and perhaps the Daily News is helping to warm up the playing field for another Latino politician to challenge Villaraigosa. Perhaps Valley Councilmember Richard Alarcon feels he can take on Antonio since the mayor is so weak, these days.

Breaking News
Updated: June 29, 2008

Villaraigosa: Term that began with high hopes has seen share of hard times

EXCERPTS [Zuma's comments in brackets.]:


(Three years ago) an energetic and inspirational vigor, he outlined sweeping visions for a "subway to the sea," a cleaner and safer city, education reform and a raft of other new plans to fix a broad range of issues.

And for the first two years, he seemed to do no wrong.

But then came what would be dubbed the "Summer of Love," a sardonic reference to Villaraigosa's personal turmoil that included separating from his wife, Corina, divorce proceedings and the salacious disclosure that he was having an affair.

After hitting the campaign trail for Sen. Hillary Clinton earlier this year, he hopes to be equally involved in the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama. [Emphasis on "he hopes" after spending all those months neglecting his job as mayor while riding the loser horse. I TOLD ONE OF HIS PRIMARY CAMPAIGN CREW MEMBERS EARLY ON THAT ANTONIO WAS RIDING THE WRONG HORSE. Their reply was, "Hillary Clinton is un-stoppable and she's going straight to the White House!" (It wasn't and angry comment, but one of excitement and boastfulness.) Whomp, whomp, whomp, whomp...(deflated) Whooooooooomp. So now all that time was spent and the Mayor of Los Angeles pissed off someone who will likely be the next President of the United States. Way to go, dummy Antonio! Good use of your time as mayor at the taxpayers' expense.]

But he would give Villaraigosa average marks.

David Diaz, an urban studies professor at California State University, Los Angeles, says, "When he first came in, he tried to do too much. And it turned out he was one false step away from having problems. I'm not sure he did enough to engage the city and lay the groundwork for what he wanted to do."

Villaraigosa ticks off a number of successes for which he believes he has not received enough credit, including pushing ahead on major issues like gangs and crime programs.

He hired Jeff Carr as a city gang "czar." In a major coup his office now controls all of the city's anti-gang programs, and the controversial and troubled Bridges program has ended. [Yes, the mayor "now controls" -- but that doesn't mean any progress is being made or will ever be made under this program.]

He also cites his launch of numerous environmental programs - from renewable energy at the Department of Water and Power [what kind of impact has that made?] to a clean trucks program at the Port of Los Angeles [that SCAG (Federal) warned must be done. So that would have been done if Helen Keller was mayor.]

Then there's the hiring of more police officers - the LAPD should hit 10,000 sworn officers this year - and transit gains including synchronizing traffic lights and filling thousands of potholes. [YES, we know Villaraigosa "should" hit 10,000 sworn officers. Will they? And it's the people who had their trash collection fees tripled to pay for these hires that accomplished this goal. Not the mayor! The mayor didn't do anything innovative or leader-based except think of a new way to cover the costs.]

"People told me to concentrate on one or two things and get those done," Villaraigosa said. "You know who those people are? Political consultants and pundits. If I had done that, nothing would get done. ..."[No Antonio...maybe something would have gotten done. I AGREE WITH THE CONSULTANTS! But then again, it doesn't help when everything you try to accomplish ends up getting smacked down by a judge because you don't factor the law into your plans.]

Instead, he said, he serves all parts of the city, an approach that also serves him politically. [This is the reverse strategy of a leader and is the reason nothing gets done as his political consultants have tried to warn him, as he just admitted, that dummy!]

And he has persevered in a long political battle that means he finally this year will get control of 10 schools from Los Angeles Unified that will be part of his long-touted "Partnership for Los Angeles Schools," a five-year pilot program designed to reform education for the city's poorest children. [He lost AB 1381 (Mayoral takeover of LAUSD) because a judge smacked it down due to being illegal. So now he has this new "partnership" scheme that is in violation of the City Charter and completely illegal.]

"It would have been easy for me to walk away from that after we were defeated in the courts, but this is too important," Villaraigosa said. [Yes, it IS too important. It's over $20 Billion in school construction and repair money to be handed out to cronies with patronage (front-end loaded) management contracts. AFTER ALL...he said it was "important" -- he didn't say to who.
OH...you thought he meant the kids? YOUR BAD!]

Now, as part of his re-election efforts, Villaraigosa has been on a round of fundraisers trying to raise more than $1 million for his campaign next year. [So he can suck up all the money for other candidates, which isn't a bad strategy. But all the money isn't going to help. It's like spending money on an ad campaign promoting a restaurant that everyone already knows has bad food and bad service. All of his ads will only be remind people who he now sickens that they better get out and vote against him. At this point, Villar should run NO ADS and win the election quietly behind the scenes with his political negotiations with big organizations and not remind people about him, cause he will rally people to come out to vote for "Anyone But Antonio '09!"]

But there also is the question expected to dog Villaraigosa throughout his mayoral campaign: Will he run for governor in 2010?

"I am focused 100 percent on being mayor of Los Angeles," Villaraigosa said Friday. [JUST LIKE HE SAID HE WASN'T GOING TO RUN FOR MAYOR WHEN HE WAS RUNNING FOR CITY COUNCIL!]

"We have laid a foundation for education, public safety, gang reduction and youth development, economic development, cleaning and greening the city, affordable housing, the homeless, traffic. We have made a lot of progress. [YES, you have made progress in laying the foundation (consolidating all the power under one roof and one office, but you haven't budged the meter on a single one of these issues. BUT AS SOMEONE WHO MAY BE RUNNING FOR MAYOR IN THE NEXT ELECTION, I APPRECIATE ALL OF YOUR EFFORTS INTO HANDING ALL THE POWER AND ACCOUNTABILITY INTO THE MAYOR'S OFFICE AS SOMEONE WHO HOPES TO BE THE NEXT MAYOR! Thanks, bro!]

"I think the best thing I can do is the best I can do." [Aw, Hell Naw. That ain't even CLOSE to being good enough. You need to stay home and stay out of spotlight so you don't make things harder for Robin Kramer and everyone else who is stuck cleaning up your do-do.]

And to some homeowners, there's also a sense that the mayor isn't considering them enough as well.

"It is not that he's out of touch. He has a reasonably good network to get input," said Gerald Silver, head of Homeowners of Encino. "But the problem is he doesn't agree with us." [Gerald, that's the best line in the article and I totally agree. I have always said the mayor of L.A. has access to all the top minds and top resources. But it doesn't do any good if you have ulterior motives that conflict with the everyday members of the community.]

Silver said he and others have long been concerned about over-development and the resulting impacts. ["Concerned" is too mild. That's like reporting on the Hindenberg and saying, "It appears there may be a glitch."]

[COMEDY RELIEF]: Jaime Regalado, director of the Pat Brown Institute of Politics at California State University, Los Angeles, said, "I think he has done a reasonably good job in recovering from his problems last year. Maybe he's two-thirds recovered," Regalado said. [Houston, we have a problem! This person thinks the mayor has done a "reasonably good job in recovering." Two-thirds, huh? L-M-F-A-O...Call an ambulance...I can't catch my breath from laughing too hard! From where the mayor is at, two-thirds would be a bigger miracle than Kobe winning a championship without Shaq.]

Full article

ZumaTimes.com
(Hey, LA Times, how about a little local coverage on the front page once a year, or so?)

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Daily News Opinion: Is DWP Exploding Infrastructure "Freak Accident" A "Crime of Utility" (And a compounded crime?)

From Daily News Opinion

Crimes of utility

It was bad enough that the Los Angeles City Council turned its back on the people of the city and voted in years of higher DWP bills without changing any of the behavior that created the need for rate hikes.

But when city officials dredged up the death of a firefighter in Westchester in late March to justify the fleecing of Angelenos, it actually compounded this crime.

What DWP General Manager H. David Nahai and some council members perhaps don't realize is that by saying the Department of Water and Power needs these higher water and power rates to fix the electrical problems that led to the exploding manhole covers - injuring two Los Angeles firefighters, one fatally - it actually makes city officials bigger criminals than just misspending the public's money.

If Los Angeles' aging infrastructure is killing people, who's to blame? Here's a hint: It's not the manhole's fault.

From LA Daily Blog posted before the DWP meeting at Council: "Desperate times (for Nahai) require desperate measures, so don't be surprised if you hear him blame the recent tragic death of an L.A. fire figher on aging infrastructure -- even though the Mayor of Los Angeles already declared publicly it was a "freak accident."

So the Mayor, Nahai, CM Bill Rosendahl and Los Angeles City Council need to get their story straight. Was it a "freak accident" as the mayor has stated, or was it because of aging infrastructure that you should have replaced, which may have been "freaky", but not an accident.

Full article

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Zuma's NEWS WIRE (Shady Report) for Wednesday April 2, 2008 (All The News That's Fit To Link)

Click for LIVE feed of Council meeting/DWP Rate Hike Agenda Item (10 AM)

DWP Rate Hike on Today's Council Agenda: What to expect from DWP GM Nahai
(Desperate times (for Nahai) requires desperate measures, so don't be surprised if you hear Nahai blame the recent tragic death of an L.A. fire figher on aging infrastructure -- even though the Mayor of Los Angeles already declared publicly it was a "freak accident". I SURE HOPE NOT!)

AUDIO: Massive DWP Thread! Public Comment & Councilmember Discussion of DWP Rate Hikes (Including David Nahai) (In case you missed it, in preparation of today's Council meeting.)

Best Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa Video EVER: Mayor Interrupts Hecklers on Street - Plus, Hear Mayor Say, "We Gotta Join Mccain!"

Tennie Pierce Outside Council Cost L.A. City $1.4 Million (Initially Approved for only $750,000)

Wyvernwood Releases Proposed Plan "Facts" As Protected Oak Trees Are Already Cut Down (Before The Communities Eyes)

DWP Rate Increases Up For Vote In LA City Council

Why Pierce case was settled

Zuma Dogg's First Political Endorsement: Jackie Speier for U.S. Congress!

CM Jose Huizar Says "No" To Mural on Boyle Heights Police Station

Mayor Harassed During Skid Row Lighting Speech

That deadly gang in City Hall

Hybrid-car drivers may lose parking perks

City students less likely to graduate than suburban kids

Paulson: 'More bumps' loom

LA Council Members Support State Resolution On Medical Pot

Is L.A. City Councimember Jose Huizar Already Raising Money To Run For Another Office

L.A. County drivers could pay an extra 9 cents per gallon at the gas pump, or additional $90 vehicle registration to help fight global warming

From Zuma's Inbox (4/2/08):
People in my neighborhood have been monitoring a situation you should be aware of. The cops have been sent from the west side to patrol the corners of CD14 & CD 1. (Almost like they are trying to keep the people in a cage). They have been here for almost two weeks, patrolling at all hours. And the cops use homeowner driveways to turnaround in, on their way to somewhere else. (Nice headlights.)

All the news that's fit to link

zumadogg@gmail.com
(213) 785-7272